![]() Sabine Hossenfelder, a theoretical physicist at the Frankfurt Institute, wrote a response to CERN’s announcement making the case that we shouldn’t bother: “A bigger particle collider is one of the most expensive experiments you can think of, and we do not currently have a reason to think it would discover anything new.” We discovered the Higgs Boson, which completed the picture of the standard model of physics, and since then the LHC’s extensive tests have turned up no signs of new discoveries.ĬERN argues that a new collider might allow us to peer into remaining mysteries in physics, from dark matter to the abundance of matter over antimatter. There, beams of protons and heavy ions are collided at high energies, and measuring equipment collects data about our universe.īut do we need another particle collider? When CERN built the Large Hadron Collider in 2008, we had a very strong reason to expect that we’d discover something new in physics - our existing models of how subatomic particles interact weren’t adding up, and they were failing to add up in a way that suggested there was a new particle out there to be discovered in the range of energies the Large Hadron Collider was capable of producing.īut the world of particle physics looks quite different now. The Large Hadron Collider lies in a 17-mile-long tunnel beneath the France-Switzerland border. ![]() The group released its conceptual design report earlier this month the proposed collider, called the Future Circular Collider, would be more than 60 miles in circumference, cost more than €20 billion ($22 billion), and be completed around 2050. ![]() ![]() The European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), the organization that runs the Large Hadron Collider near Geneva, Switzerland, is looking to build a new particle accelerator - an even bigger one. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |